Exam Preparation Study Guide Generator
Builds a personalized, day-by-day exam study guide with schedule, cheat sheets, practice sets, and progress tracking.
Example run
Generated by Claude Opus 5.5 on September 23, 2026
Inputs used
- Subject or course name
- Organic Chemistry II (undergraduate)
- Exam type
- University midterm exam (in-person, closed-book, 90 minutes)
- Topics or syllabus
- SN1/SN2 and E1/E2 mechanisms, alcohols and ethers reactions, aldehydes/ketones (nucleophilic addition), carboxylic acids and derivatives (esterification, amide formation), aromatic substitution (EAS and nucleophilic aromatic substitution), spectroscopy basics (IR peak identification, 1H NMR splitting and chemical shifts)
- Days or weeks available
- 14 days (exam is on October 7, 2026)
- Hours per day
- 3 hours on weekdays, 5 hours on weekends
- Choose one
- Intermediate
- Topics i struggle with
- Distinguishing SN1 vs SN2 vs E1 vs E2 conditions, predicting major products of EAS with directing groups, and reading 1H NMR splitting patterns (multiplicity)
- Choose one
- Mixed
Organic Chemistry II Midterm Study Guide
Exam: Wednesday, October 7, 2026 · 90 min · closed-book · mixed format Window: Wed Sep 23 to Tue Oct 6 (14 study days, about 48 hours total)
Your details were complete, so I haven't asked clarifying questions. I've made these assumptions:
- Format: "Mixed" means multiple choice, predict-the-product, mechanism arrows, a short synthesis and spectroscopy structure problems.
- Topic weights: The weights below are typical for OChem II midterms. If your professor has posted a past exam or a topic breakdown, swap them in.
1. Diagnostic & Priorities
| Rank | Topic | Est. exam weight | Your status | Why it's ranked here |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SN1/SN2/E1/E2 | 20–25% | ⚠️ Weak | Appears in MC, mechanism and synthesis questions. It is also the logic behind alcohol and ether reactions. |
| 2 | EAS directing effects (+ NAS) | 15–20% | ⚠️ Weak | Nearly guaranteed to appear as a synthesis-order question. |
| 3 | ¹H NMR splitting and shifts (+ IR) | 15–20% | ⚠️ Weak | Structure-elucidation questions are worth many points and follow a small set of patterns you can learn. |
| 4 | Aldehydes/ketones (nucleophilic addition) | 15% | OK | Uses the same mechanism logic as acid derivatives, so study them back to back. |
| 5 | Carboxylic acids and derivatives | 15% | OK | Built on one idea, the reactivity ladder. |
| 6 | Alcohols and ethers | 10% | OK | Mostly SN/E logic applied to new substrates, so it improves when #1 does. |
Highest-leverage move: Master the SN/E decision tree first (Days 1–2). It directly powers about 30–35% of the exam, because alcohol and ether reactions use the same logic.
2. Day-by-Day Study Schedule
Methods used in the schedule:
- BPR (blank-page recall): write everything you know about a topic from memory, then check your notes.
- Drill: timed practice problems.
- Interleave: mixed-topic sets in shuffled order.
- FC: flashcards (Anki or paper), practiced in both directions.
Error log: Keep one throughout. Each entry records the question, your wrong answer, the correct answer and the type of error (e.g., "forgot bulky base → Hofmann").
| Date | Hrs | Blocks | Method | Review / Rest |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wed Sep 23 | 3 | 45 min diagnostic (2 questions per topic from §4, untimed but closed-book) · 30 min scoring and starting the error log · 1h45 SN/E: build the decision tree from the cheat sheet, then redraw it from memory | Diagnostic, BPR | Set up flashcards for SN/E conditions |
| Thu Sep 24 | 3 | 1h SN/E mechanisms: arrows, inversion, carbocations, anti-periplanar E2 · 1h drill: 20 substrate + reagent scenarios · 30 min alcohols as SN/E (PBr₃, SOCl₂, TsCl, HX) · 30 min FC | Drill | Day-1 cards (spaced +1 day) |
| Fri Sep 25 | 3 | 1h30 EAS: arenium ion, the 5 core reactions, why groups direct (draw the resonance forms) · 1h directing-group drill · 30 min mixed SN/E set (10 questions) | Drill, Interleave | SN/E (+2 days) |
| Sat Sep 26 | 5 | 2h ¹H NMR: shifts, n+1, integration, 10 structure → spectrum predictions · 45 min IR peaks · 15 min break · 1h interleaved set (SN/E + EAS + NMR) · 1h aldehydes/ketones intro | Drill, Interleave | EAS (+1 day) |
| Sun Sep 27 | 4 | 2h aldehydes/ketones: hydride, Grignard, acetal, imine/enamine (PADPED), Wittig · 1h alcohols/ethers: oxidation, Williamson, epoxide opening · 1h interleaved retrieval | BPR, Drill | Rest: afternoon off |
| Mon Sep 28 | 3 | 2h acid derivatives: reactivity ladder, addition–elimination mechanism, Fischer esterification, amide formation · 1h mixed EAS + NMR set | BPR, Interleave | NMR (+2 days) |
| Tue Sep 29 | 3 | 1h derivatives + LiAlH₄/Grignard/saponification · 45 min NAS and benzyne · 1h15 weak-area interleaved set · Week 1 checkpoint (§6) | Drill | SN/E (+5 days) |
| Wed Sep 30 | 3 | 1h30 multistep synthesis (EAS ordering, functional group conversions) · 1h blank-page mechanisms (SN1, SN2, E2, EAS, Fischer, imine) · 30 min FC | BPR | Carbonyl (+3 days) |
| Thu Oct 1 | 3 | Weak-area sprint: 1h hard SN/E (cyclohexane E2, rearrangements) · 1h NMR unknowns · 1h EAS with two substituents | Drill | Error-log retest |
| Fri Oct 2 | 3 | 1h30 carbonyl + derivatives mixed · 45 min spectroscopy unknowns · 45 min flashcards | Interleave | Early night |
| Sat Oct 3 | 5 | Mock Exam 1 (90 min, timed, closed-book) · 15 min break · 1h30 full correction and error log · 1h re-drill the 2 weakest error types · 30 min FC | Mock | Break is mandatory |
| Sun Oct 4 | 4 | 2h targeted fixes from Mock 1 · 1h redraw all key mechanisms from memory · 1h rewrite the cheat sheet from memory, then compare | BPR | Rest: afternoon off |
| Mon Oct 5 | 3 | Mock Exam 2 (90 min) · 1h review · 30 min FC | Mock | Light evening |
| Tue Oct 6 | 2 | 45 min cheat-sheet review · 45 min speed round (15 weak-area questions) · 30 min logistics (ID, pencils, calculator if allowed, route) | Review | No new material. 8 h of sleep. |
| Wed Oct 7 | — | EXAM. 15-min warm-up: 3 easy problems you've already solved | — | — |
3. Key Concepts Cheat Sheet
A. SN1 / SN2 / E1 / E2 (Priority #1)
Core idea: First classify the substrate (methyl, 1°, 2°, 3°). Then classify the reagent: strong nucleophile, strong base, bulky base, or weak nucleophile/base.
| SN2 | SN1 | E2 | E1 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Steps | 1 (concerted) | 2 (carbocation) | 1 (concerted) | 2 (carbocation) |
| Rate law | k[RX][Nu] | k[RX] | k[RX][Base] | k[RX] |
| Substrate | Me > 1° > 2° (never 3°) | 3° > 2° | 3° > 2° > 1° | 3° > 2° |
| Reagent | Strong Nu | Weak Nu (often the solvent) | Strong base | Weak base + heat |
| Solvent | Polar aprotic (DMSO, DMF, acetone, MeCN) | Polar protic (H₂O, ROH) | Varies | Polar protic |
| Stereo/outcome | Inversion | Racemization; rearrangements | Anti-periplanar H; Zaitsev (Hofmann with bulky base) | Zaitsev; rearrangements |
Decision tree:
- Methyl or 1°: SN2. The exception is a bulky base (t-BuOK, LDA), which gives E2.
- 2° substrate:
- Strong base (NaOH, NaOEt, NaOMe) → E2 major.
- Good nucleophile that is a weak base (I⁻, Br⁻, CN⁻, N₃⁻, RS⁻) in polar aprotic solvent → SN2.
- Weak Nu/base in protic solvent → SN1/E1 mixture.
- 3° substrate:
- Strong base → E2.
- Weak Nu/solvent → SN1 (E1 grows with heat).
- Never SN2.
Common mistake: Calling 2° halide + NaOEt an SN2 reaction. Strong base on a 2° or 3° carbon means E2.
Memory hooks:
- "SN2 hates crowds."
- "The number tells you who's in the rate law. '1' = only the substrate. Weak reagents give 1."
- "Bulky base goes for the easy H (Hofmann)."
B. Alcohols & Ethers
Making OH into a leaving group:
- TsCl/pyridine: retention (the C–O bond isn't broken).
- PBr₃ or SOCl₂: 1°/2° alcohols, SN2, inversion.
- HX: 3° alcohols react by SN1, and rearrangements are possible.
Oxidation:
- PCC: 1° → aldehyde.
- H₂CrO₄/Jones: 1° → carboxylic acid; 2° → ketone.
- 3° alcohols: no reaction.
Other key reactions:
- Dehydration: H₂SO₄ with heat gives E1 (Zaitsev).
- Williamson ether synthesis: RO⁻ + methyl or 1° R–X (SN2).
- Ether cleavage: excess HI or HBr with heat.
- Epoxide opening:
- Basic/strong Nu: attack at the less substituted carbon.
- Acidic: attack at the more substituted carbon.
- Both give anti opening.
Common mistake: Running a Williamson synthesis with a 3° halide. You get E2 (an alkene), not an ether. The bulky piece must be the alkoxide.
Memory hook: "Base goes Less, Acid goes More."
C. Aldehydes & Ketones (Nucleophilic Addition)
Core idea: Nucleophiles attack the δ⁺ carbonyl carbon to give a tetrahedral alkoxide, which is then protonated. Aldehydes react faster than ketones because they are less hindered and have more δ⁺ character.
Must-know reactions:
- NaBH₄ or LiAlH₄: aldehyde → 1° alcohol; ketone → 2° alcohol.
- RMgBr then H₃O⁺: formaldehyde → 1°, aldehyde → 2°, ketone → 3° alcohol.
- 2 ROH with H⁺ (remove water) → acetal, which works as a protecting group because it is stable to base and hydride.
- R–NH₂ at pH 4–5 → imine (C=N–R).
- R₂NH → enamine.
- Ph₃P=CR₂ (Wittig) → alkene.
- HCN or NaCN → cyanohydrin.
Common mistake: Adding a Grignard reagent to a molecule that has an O–H, N–H or COOH. The Grignard is destroyed by the acid–base reaction, so protect the group first.
Memory hook: Acid-catalyzed acetal and imine formation both follow PADPED: Protonate, Add, Deprotonate, Protonate, Eliminate, Deprotonate.
D. Carboxylic Acids & Derivatives
Core idea: Nucleophilic acyl substitution goes by addition–elimination through a tetrahedral intermediate. A derivative can only be converted down the reactivity ladder.
Reactivity ladder (most to least reactive):
- Acid chloride
- Anhydride
- Ester ≈ acid
- Amide
- Carboxylate
Must-know reactions:
- Fischer esterification: RCOOH + R'OH with H⁺ catalyst ⇌ ester + H₂O. It is an equilibrium, so use excess alcohol or remove water.
- Amide formation: acid chloride + 2 equiv amine. The 2nd equivalent traps the HCl.
- Acid + amine directly gives an ammonium salt. It needs strong heat or DCC to form the amide.
- Saponification: ester + NaOH → carboxylate + alcohol. It is irreversible because the carboxylate is deprotonated.
- LiAlH₄:
- Ester → 1° alcohol.
- Amide → amine (the C=O becomes CH₂).
- Excess RMgBr + ester: adds twice to give a 3° alcohol.
Common mistake: Trying to make an acid chloride from an amide. That goes uphill on the ladder, so it won't happen.
Memory hook: "Clumsy Ants Eat Apples" (Chloride → Anhydride → Ester → Amide). Water flows downhill.
E. Aromatic Substitution (Priority #2)
EAS mechanism:
- An electrophile is attacked by the ring, giving the arenium ion (sigma complex). This step is rate-determining.
- The ring loses H⁺, which restores aromaticity.
The 5 core EAS reactions:
| Reaction | Reagents | Note |
|---|---|---|
| Halogenation | Br₂/FeBr₃ or Cl₂/AlCl₃ | |
| Nitration | HNO₃/H₂SO₄ | Electrophile is NO₂⁺ |
| Sulfonation | SO₃/H₂SO₄ | Reversible |
| FC alkylation | R–Cl/AlCl₃ | Rearranges; polyalkylates |
| FC acylation | RCOCl/AlCl₃ | No rearrangement |
Useful follow-ups:
- Reduce the acyl C=O to CH₂: Clemmensen (Zn(Hg)/HCl) or Wolff–Kishner (H₂NNH₂/KOH).
- Reduce NO₂ to NH₂: Fe/HCl or Sn/HCl.
Directing groups:
| o/p activators (strong → weak) | o/p deactivators | meta deactivators |
|---|---|---|
| –NH₂, –NHR, –OH, –OR > –NHCOR > alkyl, –Ph | –F, –Cl, –Br, –I | –NO₂, –CN, –SO₃H, –CHO, –COR, –COOH, –COOR, –CF₃, –NR₃⁺ |
Rules when two substituents are present:
- The strongest activator wins.
- Don't substitute between two groups that are meta to each other (steric hindrance).
- Para usually beats ortho.
Friedel–Crafts fails on:
- Rings with a meta director (they are too deactivated).
- Rings bearing –NH₂ or –NHR (the nitrogen complexes with AlCl₃).
NAS (nucleophilic aromatic substitution):
- Needs a strong EWG (NO₂) ortho or para to the leaving group.
- Goes through a Meisenheimer anion.
- F is the fastest leaving group, because the addition step is rate-limiting.
- Benzyne (NaNH₂) needs no EWG but can give product mixtures.
Common mistake: Choosing the wrong step order in a synthesis. The current substituent directs the next one, so install the directing group you need first.
Memory hooks:
- "Lone pair on the attached atom → o/p."
- "δ⁺ or a π-bond to O/N on the attached atom → meta."
- "Halogens are the oddballs: they deactivate but still direct o/p."
F. Spectroscopy (Priority #3)
IR peaks:
| Bond | Wavenumber (cm⁻¹) | Look |
|---|---|---|
| O–H alcohol | 3200–3550 | Broad, rounded |
| O–H acid | 2500–3300 | Very broad, overlaps C–H |
| N–H | 3300–3500 | 1° amine = 2 spikes; 2° = 1 spike |
| sp C–H | ~3300 | Sharp |
| sp² C–H | 3000–3100 | Just above 3000 |
| sp³ C–H | 2850–2960 | Just below 3000 |
| Aldehyde C–H | ~2720 and ~2820 | Two small peaks |
| C≡N | ~2250 | |
| C≡C | ~2100–2260 | |
| C=O | Acid chloride ~1800; anhydride ~1820 + 1760; ester ~1740; aldehyde ~1725; ketone/acid ~1715; amide ~1650–1690 | Strong |
| C=C | 1600–1680 (aromatic ~1600, 1500) | |
| C–O | 1000–1300 |
¹H NMR chemical shifts (ppm):
| Proton type | Shift |
|---|---|
| Alkyl | 0.9–1.5 |
| Next to C=O, benzylic or allylic | 2.0–2.5 |
| H–C–O or H–C–X | 3.3–4.5 |
| Vinyl | 4.5–6.5 |
| Aromatic | 6.5–8 |
| Aldehyde | 9–10 |
| COOH | 10–13 (broad) |
| OH or NH | 1–5 (variable, broad) |
Three kinds of NMR information:
- Number of signals = number of sets of equivalent H.
- Integration = how many H the signal itself represents.
- Multiplicity (the n+1 rule) = n non-equivalent H on adjacent carbons, plus 1.
Splitting rules:
- Equivalent H don't split each other.
- O–H usually appears as a broad singlet and doesn't split its neighbors.
Must-know splitting fingerprints:
| Group | Pattern |
|---|---|
| Ethyl | triplet (3H) + quartet (2H) |
| Isopropyl | doublet (6H) + septet (1H) |
| tert-Butyl | singlet (9H) |
| Monosubstituted benzene | ~7.2 ppm, 5H |
| para-Disubstituted benzene | two doublets, 2H each |
Degrees of unsaturation (DoU): DoU = (2C + 2 + N − H − X)/2. DoU ≥ 4 suggests a benzene ring.
Common mistake: Counting the H on the same carbon, or the O–H, as neighbors when applying n+1.
- Multiplicity tells you about the neighbors.
- Integration tells you about the signal itself.
Memory hooks:
- "Neighbors plus one."
- "Ethyl is 3–2 (t–q), isopropyl is 6–1 (d–sept)."
4. Practice Set (answers at the end of each set)
Set A: SN1/SN2/E1/E2
- (Easy) 1-bromobutane + NaCN in DMSO. Mechanism and product?
- (Easy) 2-bromo-2-methylpropane in ethanol, 25 °C. Major mechanism and product?
- (Med) 2-bromobutane + NaOEt/EtOH, heat. Major product?
- (Med) 2-bromo-2-methylbutane + t-BuOK. Major product?
- (Med) (R)-2-bromobutane + NaN₃ in DMF. Product with stereochemistry?
- (Med) For an SN2 reaction, [RX] is tripled and [Nu⁻] is doubled. How does the rate change? What if the reaction were SN1?
- (Hard) Rank by SN2 rate with NaI/acetone: bromomethane, 1-bromobutane, 2-bromobutane, 1-bromo-2,2-dimethylpropane.
- (Hard) cis- and trans-1-bromo-2-methylcyclohexane are each treated with NaOEt. Give the major E2 product of each.
Answers A:
- SN2 (1° substrate, strong Nu, aprotic solvent) → pentanenitrile.
- SN1 (3° substrate, weak Nu, protic solvent, no heat) → tert-butyl ethyl ether, with minor E1 alkene.
- E2 (2° substrate + strong base) → trans-2-butene (Zaitsev; trans is more stable).
- E2 Hofmann (bulky base) → 2-methyl-1-butene.
- SN2 with inversion → (S)-2-azidobutane. N₃ takes Br's top priority, and the geometry flips.
- SN2: rate goes up ×6. SN1: rate goes up ×3, because only [RX] is in the rate law.
- Fastest to slowest: bromomethane > 1-bromobutane > 2-bromobutane > neopentyl bromide. Neopentyl is 1° but its β-branching blocks backside attack.
- E2 needs axial Br and an axial anti H.
- cis: The chair with Br axial puts CH₃ equatorial, so the C2–H is axial. Elimination toward C2 gives 1-methylcyclohexene (Zaitsev).
- trans: Br is axial only when CH₃ is also axial, so the C2–H is equatorial. The only anti H is on C6, giving 3-methylcyclohexene (non-Zaitsev, and slower).
Set B: Alcohols & Ethers
- (Easy) 1-butanol + PCC? 1-butanol + Na₂Cr₂O₇/H₂SO₄?
- (Easy) Best Williamson route to tert-butyl methyl ether?
- (Med) 3-methyl-2-butanol + HBr. Major product?
- (Med) 2,2-dimethyloxirane with (a) NaOCH₃/CH₃OH and (b) CH₃OH/H₂SO₄. Products?
- (Hard) (R)-2-butanol + TsCl/pyridine, then NaBr in DMF. Final product with stereochemistry?
Answers B:
- PCC gives butanal. Chromic acid gives butanoic acid.
- (CH₃)₃CO⁻Na⁺ + CH₃I. The reverse pairing (CH₃O⁻ + t-BuBr) gives E2 and isobutylene.
- 2-bromo-2-methylbutane. The 2° cation undergoes a 1,2-hydride shift to a 3° cation (SN1).
- (a) Base attacks the less hindered carbon → 1-methoxy-2-methyl-2-propanol. (b) Acid attacks the more substituted carbon → 2-methoxy-2-methyl-1-propanol.
- Tosylation keeps the configuration: (R)-tosylate. SN2 with Br⁻ inverts it: (S)-2-bromobutane.
Set C: Aldehydes & Ketones
- (Easy) Cyclohexanone + CH₃MgBr, then H₃O⁺?
- (Easy) Rank by reactivity toward nucleophilic addition: acetone, formaldehyde, acetaldehyde.
- (Med) Acetone + CH₃NH₂ with catalytic acid. Product, and why pH ~4–5?
- (Med) Cyclohexanone + Ph₃P=CH₂?
- (Hard) Convert methyl 4-oxopentanoate to 5-hydroxypentan-2-one.
Answers C:
- 1-methylcyclohexanol (a 3° alcohol).
- Formaldehyde > acetaldehyde > acetone. Alkyl groups add steric bulk and donate electrons, which lowers reactivity.
- The imine (CH₃)₂C=NCH₃, formed by PADPED.
- Too acidic: the amine is protonated and stops being a nucleophile.
- Too basic: the O–H can't be protonated to leave as water.
- Methylenecyclohexane (Wittig).
- The goal is to reduce the ester but keep the ketone:
- Protect the ketone as an acetal with ethylene glycol and TsOH.
- Reduce the ester to CH₂OH with LiAlH₄.
- Remove the acetal with H₃O⁺.
- LiAlH₄ alone would reduce both carbonyls.
Set D: Carboxylic Acids & Derivatives
- (Easy) Rank by reactivity: ethyl acetate, acetamide, acetyl chloride, acetic anhydride.
- (Easy) Acetic acid + ethanol with H₂SO₄. Product? Give two ways to raise the yield.
- (Med) Benzoyl chloride + 2 equiv diethylamine. Product, and why 2 equivalents?
- (Med) Ethyl benzoate + excess CH₃MgBr, then H₃O⁺?
- (Med) N-methylacetamide + LiAlH₄, then H₂O?
- (Hard) Fischer esterification uses ¹⁸O-labeled ethanol. Does the label end up in the ester or in the water? Why?
Answers D:
- Acetyl chloride > acetic anhydride > ethyl acetate > acetamide.
- The product is ethyl acetate. Raise the yield with excess ethanol, or by removing water (Dean–Stark trap or drying agent).
- N,N-diethylbenzamide. The 2nd equivalent of amine neutralizes the HCl. Otherwise the HCl protonates the amine and it can no longer act as a nucleophile.
- 2-phenyl-2-propanol (+ ethanol). Two CH₃ groups add: the first displaces OEt to give a ketone, and the second adds to that ketone.
- N-methylethylamine (CH₃CH₂NHCH₃). The C=O becomes CH₂.
- The label ends up in the ester. The alcohol oxygen is the nucleophile, and the acid's O–H is what leaves as water.
Set E: Aromatic Substitution
- (Easy) Nitration of anisole. Major product?
- (Easy) Br₂/FeBr₃ on nitrobenzene?
- (Med) Rank by EAS rate: nitrobenzene, phenol, chlorobenzene, toluene, benzene, benzaldehyde.
- (Med) Nitration of 4-methylanisole. Major product?
- (Med) Br₂/FeBr₃ on 4-nitrotoluene?
- (Med) Benzene + 1-chloropropane/AlCl₃ gives mainly isopropylbenzene. Why? How do you make propylbenzene instead?
- (Hard) Synthesize m-bromoaniline from benzene.
- (Hard) Which reacts fastest with NaOCH₃: chlorobenzene, 3-nitrochlorobenzene, 4-nitrochlorobenzene or 2,4-dinitrochlorobenzene? What is the product?
Answers E:
- 4-nitroanisole (para major, ortho minor). OMe is a strong o/p activator.
- 3-bromonitrobenzene. NO₂ is a meta director.
- Fastest to slowest: phenol > toluene > benzene > chlorobenzene > benzaldehyde > nitrobenzene.
- 4-methyl-2-nitroanisole. Substitution goes ortho to OMe, because the stronger activator wins.
- 2-bromo-4-nitrotoluene. The directing effects cooperate: this position is ortho to CH₃ and meta to NO₂.
- The 1° carbocation rearranges to a 2° cation by hydride shift. For propylbenzene:
- FC acylation with propanoyl chloride/AlCl₃ → propiophenone.
- Clemmensen or Wolff–Kishner reduction → propylbenzene.
- Three steps, in this order:
- HNO₃/H₂SO₄ → nitrobenzene.
- Br₂/FeBr₃ → m-bromonitrobenzene (NO₂ directs meta).
- Fe/HCl, then NaOH workup → m-bromoaniline.
- If you reduce first, NH₂ directs o/p, which is wrong.
- 2,4-dinitrochlorobenzene reacts fastest. Its ortho and para NO₂ groups stabilize the Meisenheimer anion. The product is 2,4-dinitroanisole.
Set F: Spectroscopy
- (Easy) Cyclohexanol vs. cyclohexanone. What IR difference tells them apart?
- (Easy) How many ¹H NMR signals does p-xylene give? What are their integrations and multiplicities?
- (Easy) Predict the ¹H NMR of 2-chloropropane.
- (Med) Predict the ¹H NMR of ethyl acetate.
- (Med) What is the splitting of the middle CH₂ in 1-bromopropane?
- (Med) C₄H₈O; IR 1715 cm⁻¹; NMR δ 2.4 (q, 2H), 2.1 (s, 3H), 1.05 (t, 3H). Structure?
- (Med) C₃H₆O₂; IR very broad 2500–3300 cm⁻¹ and 1710 cm⁻¹; NMR δ 11.5 (br s, 1H), 2.35 (q, 2H), 1.15 (t, 3H). Structure?
- (Hard) C₈H₁₀; NMR δ 7.2 (m, 5H), 2.6 (q, 2H), 1.2 (t, 3H). Structure?
Answers F:
- Cyclohexanol shows a broad O–H at ~3300 and no C=O. Cyclohexanone shows a strong C=O at ~1715 and no O–H.
- 2 signals: 7.0 ppm (s, 4H) and 2.3 ppm (s, 6H).
- δ ~1.5 (d, 6H) and ~4.1 (septet, 1H).
- δ 2.0 (s, 3H, CH₃C=O), 4.1 (q, 2H, OCH₂) and 1.2 (t, 3H).
- It has 3 + 2 = 5 neighbors, so a sextet (assuming similar coupling constants).
- Butanone. DoU = 1 (the C=O). The singlet CH₃ sits next to C=O, and the ethyl group gives the q + t pair.
- Propanoic acid. The very broad O–H and the 11.5 ppm signal mark a COOH.
- Ethylbenzene. DoU = 4, which fits a benzene ring; the 5H aromatic signal means monosubstituted.
Timed Mock Exam Outline (90 min, run twice: Oct 3 and Oct 5)
Rules: Closed-book, with a timer and no phone. Build Mock 2 from different questions than Mock 1.
| Part | Format | Items | Time | Points |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | Multiple choice (conditions, rankings, directing groups, IR peaks) | 15 | 20 min | 30 |
| B | Predict product / supply reagent | 6 | 20 min | 24 |
| C | Mechanism arrows | 2 | 18 min | 16 |
| D | Multistep synthesis | 1 | 12 min | 12 |
| E | Spectroscopy structure elucidation | 2 | 15 min | 18 |
| — | Review pass | — | 5 min | — |
Parts A, B and E: Pull questions from Sets A–F. Save 2 questions per set that you haven't seen for Mock 2.
Part C and D items (new):
- C1. SN1 of t-BuBr in methanol.
- Answer: C–Br ionizes to the t-Bu⁺ cation. CH₃OH attacks the cation. Deprotonation gives t-Bu–OMe.
- C2. Acid-catalyzed Fischer esterification of acetic acid with methanol.
- Answer: PADPED. Protonate the C=O, MeOH adds, proton transfer onto an OH, water leaves, deprotonate.
- D. Benzene → m-nitroacetophenone.
- Answer: CH₃COCl/AlCl₃ first, then HNO₃/H₂SO₄. The acetyl group directs meta.
- Trap: nitrating first makes FC acylation fail on the deactivated ring.
- E-bonus. C₄H₈O₂; IR 1740 cm⁻¹; NMR δ 4.1 (q, 2H), 2.0 (s, 3H), 1.25 (t, 3H).
- Answer: ethyl acetate.
- Contrast with methyl propanoate: δ 3.7 (s, 3H), 2.3 (q, 2H), 1.1 (t, 3H).
- The 4.1 q means the CH₂ is on the oxygen.
Scoring:
- ≥ 80%: on track.
- 65–79%: re-drill the top 2 error types.
- < 65%: apply the re-prioritization rule in §6.
5. Technique Toolkit
- Blank-page mechanism recall. Pick a mechanism name, draw every arrow and intermediate from memory, then check it and circle what you missed. How to apply: do 3 mechanisms at the start of each session before opening your notes.
- Two-way flashcards, interleaved. Make one card for "reagent → product" and one for "product → reagent needed". Shuffle across all topics. How to apply: 15 minutes a day, and every card you miss goes back into tomorrow's pile.
- Condition-sorting drills for SN/E and EAS. Write 20 scenario cards (substrate + reagent + solvent/temp) and sort them into SN1/SN2/E1/E2 piles as fast as you can. How to apply: time yourself and aim for under 10 s per card with ≥ 90% accuracy by Oct 1.
- Exam triage + annotate-before-answer. On pass 1, answer everything you're sure of. On pass 2, do the multi-step questions. In every SN/E question, circle the substrate, box the reagent and underline the solvent/temperature before deciding. How to apply: practice this on both mocks so it becomes automatic.
6. Progress Tracker
| Checkpoint | Milestones | Self-check (must answer from memory) | On pace if… |
|---|---|---|---|
| End of Week 1 (Tue Sep 29) | All 6 topics covered once. SN/E decision tree drawn from memory. Directing-group table written from memory. | ① Why does 2° RBr + NaOEt give E2 but 2° RBr + NaN₃/DMF give SN2? ② What directs nitration of chlorobenzene, and why do halogens deactivate yet direct o/p? ③ What splitting does an isopropyl group show? | ≥ 70% on the Sets A, E and F problems attempted |
| Mid Week 2 (Thu Oct 1) | All 6 core mechanisms drawn cold. 3 multistep syntheses completed. 4 NMR unknowns solved. | ④ Give a 3-step synthesis where step order matters. ⑤ What is the product of an ester + excess Grignard? ⑥ What does a q + t pattern with the q at 4.1 ppm tell you? | ≥ 80% on weak-area sets; flashcard sort < 10 s/card |
| Mock 1 (Sat Oct 3) | Full timed exam completed and error log updated | Which error type appeared most? | ≥ 75% |
| Mock 2 (Mon Oct 5) | Improvement over Mock 1 | Did the top error types from Mock 1 recur? | ≥ 80%, with no repeated error types from Mock 1 |
Re-prioritization rule:
- Promote a topic to the first block of the next day's session if either is true:
- You score < 70% on a topic in two consecutive practice sets.
- The same error type shows up 3+ times in your log.
- Make room for it by taking time from your highest-scoring topic.
- Demote a topic to flashcards-only spaced review once you score ≥ 90% twice in a row.
Exam-Day Calm & Focus Tips
- Start with a 2-minute brain dump. When the exam begins, jot the decision tree, the directing-group list and the n+1 fingerprints in a margin (if your professor allows scratch writing). That offloads memory and steadies your nerves.
- Use the 2-minute rule. If you're stuck for 2 minutes, mark the question, move on and come back. Momentum protects your score better than stubbornness.
- Box breathing when you tense up. Breathe in 4 s, hold 4 s, out 4 s, hold 4 s, and repeat twice. Then re-read the question and circle the substrate, reagent and conditions. This resets both your panic and your focus.
You have 14 well-structured days, which is enough time to turn all three weak areas into strengths. Good luck on October 7!
Related prompts
Academic Essay Structure Assistant
Builds a thesis, outline, and evidence plan to structure a compelling academic essay.
Comprehensive Lesson Plan Creator
Generates a structured, standards-aligned lesson plan with objectives, timed activities, assessments, and differentiation.
Critical Thinking Skills Developer
Designs structured exercises, scenarios, and rubrics that build students' critical thinking and analytical reasoning skills.
Interactive Learning Activity Designer
Designs an engaging, ready-to-run interactive learning activity tailored to subject, age group, and classroom resources.