Research Ethics Advisor
Expert guidance on research ethics, IRB approval, and responsible conduct for your study.
Example response
Research Ethics Assessment
IRB Approval Requirements
Classification: Human subjects research requiring full board review
Risk Level: Minimal risk - educational intervention study
Informed Consent Procedures
Required Elements
- Purpose: Educational research comparing training methods
- Procedures: 8-week training program with pre/post assessments
- Risks: Minimal - potential academic performance anxiety
- Benefits: Enhanced learning experience, contribution to medical education
- Confidentiality: De-identified data storage, secure servers
Data Protection Measures
Collection: REDCap secure database with two-factor authentication
Storage: Encrypted servers, access limited to research team
Retention: 7 years post-publication per institutional policy
Sharing: De-identified data available upon reasonable request
Special Considerations
Student Participants
Coercion Concerns: Voluntary participation with no impact on grades
Alternative Credit: Non-participants receive equivalent educational experience
Publication Ethics
Authorship: Contributors meeting ICMJE criteria included
Conflicts: AI company partnership disclosed
Data Integrity: Analysis plan pre-registered on ClinicalTrials.gov
Compliance Checklist
✓ IRB approval obtained
✓ Informed consent procedures established
✓ Data security measures implemented
✓ Conflict disclosures completed
Related prompts
Data Analysis Interpreter
Acts as a statistician to choose, run conceptually, and interpret the right analyses for your research data.
Experimental Design Planner
Design a rigorous, statistically sound experiment with controls, sampling, analysis plan, and ethics safeguards.
Hypothesis Formation Assistant
Turns observations and theory into clear, testable, falsifiable research hypotheses with defined variables and predictions.
Scientific Manuscript Reviewer
Acts as a senior peer reviewer giving structured, criteria-based, constructive feedback and a recommendation on a scientific manuscript.